Donnise Batton v. Communication Workers
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00426-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999674610].. [14-1889]
Appeal: 14-1889
Doc: 31
Filed: 10/08/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1889
DONNISE BATTON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMUNICATION
WORKERS
OF
INCORPORATED,
WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO; COMMUNICATION
AMERICA,
LOCAL
2202;
VERIZON
VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00426-MSD-LRL)
Submitted:
April 28, 2015
Decided:
October 8, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. SuAnne Hardee Bryant, DAVIS LAW GROUP,
PC, Chesapeake, Virginia; Linda M. Martin, WILLIG, WILLIAMS &
DAVIDSON,
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania;
Patricia
A.
Dunn,
JONESDAY,
Washington,
D.C.;
Brandon
J.
Lester,
JONESDAY,
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1889
Doc: 31
Filed: 10/08/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Donnise Batton appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to
Section 301 of the Laobr Management Relations Act.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Batton v.
for
the
Commc’ns
reasons
Workers
(E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2014).
stated
by
Am.,
No.
of
the
We have
Accordingly,
district
court.
2:13-cv-00426-MSD-LRL
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?