Pamela Bond v. U.S. Dept. of Education
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999443961-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999439415-2]; denying Motion for update asto status of student loan [999460015-2] Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498417].. [14-1908]
Appeal: 14-1908
Doc: 15
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1908
PAMELA SUE BOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB)
Submitted:
December 18, 2014
Decided:
December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela Sue Bond,
Assistant
United
Appellee.
Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Linn Eckert,
States
Attorney,
Roanoke,
Virginia,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1908
Doc: 15
Filed: 12/22/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Pamela
dismissing
the
Sue
Bond
civil
appeals
action
she
States Department of Education.
find no reversible error.
the
district
brought
court’s
against
the
order
United
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, although we grant Bond
leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the
district court’s order.
See Bond v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No.
4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2014).
We deny Bond’s
motions
at
for
the
preparation
of
a
transcript
Government
expense and for an update as to the status of her student loan.
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?