Pamela Bond v. U.S. Dept. of Education

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999443961-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999439415-2]; denying Motion for update asto status of student loan [999460015-2] Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498417].. [14-1908]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1908 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1908 PAMELA SUE BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Sue Bond, Assistant United Appellee. Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1908 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Pamela dismissing the Sue Bond civil appeals action she States Department of Education. find no reversible error. the district brought court’s against the order United We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, although we grant Bond leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. See Bond v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2014). We deny Bond’s motions at for the preparation of a transcript Government expense and for an update as to the status of her student loan. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?