Elder Ramirez-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A094-223-103 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999970860].. [14-1927]

Appeal: 14-1927

Doc: 55

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1927

ELDER ANTONIO RAMIREZ-MARTINEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

October 19, 2016

Decided:

November 18, 2016

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Himedes V. Chicas, JEZIC & MOYSE, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland;
Ben Winograd, IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE APPELLATE CENTER, LLC,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer,
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan,
Assistant Director, Matthew A. Spurlock, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1927

Doc: 55

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Elder

Antonio

Ramirez-Martinez,

a

native

and

citizen

of

Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration

Appeals

(Board)

dismissing

his

appeal

from

the

immigration judge’s denial of his requests for withholding of
removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. ∗
We

have

transcript

thoroughly

of

Ramirez-Martinez’s

supporting evidence.
not

compel

a

reviewed

the

record,

merits

including

hearing

and

the
all

We conclude that the record evidence does

ruling

contrary

to

any

of

the

administrative

factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

See Gomis,

571 F.3d at 359.
Accordingly,

we

deny

reasons stated by the Board.
Aug. 7, 2014).

the

petition

for

review

for

the

See In re Ramirez-Martinez (B.I.A.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
PETITION DENIED

∗

Ramirez-Martinez does not challenge the denial of his
asylum claim as untimely, and in any event, we lack jurisdiction
to review this finding.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2012);
Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 358-59 (4th Cir. 2009).

2