Cheryl Cohens v. State of Maryland Dept. of HR
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999449142-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03419-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999495912]. Mailed to: Cheryl Cohens. [14-1940]
Appeal: 14-1940
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/18/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1940
CHERYL F. COHENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; BALTIMORE
CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:11-cv-03419-WDQ)
Submitted:
December 16, 2014
Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.
and
DIAZ,
Circuit
Decided: December 18, 2014
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheryl F. Cohens, Appellant Pro Se.
Elise Song Kurlander,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1940
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/18/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cheryl F. Cohens appeals the district court’s order
denying her motions for reconsideration of the court’s orders
granting
summary
judgment
discrimination claims.
for
Defendants
does
her
employment
On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Because Cohens
on
not
challenge
in
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
her
informal
brief
the
basis for the district court’s disposition of her motions for
reconsideration,
court’s order.
she
has
forfeited
appellate
review
of
Accordingly, we grant Cohens leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment.
dispense
with
contentions
are
the
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?