Eddie Wise v. USDA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999490548-2]; denying Motion to dismiss party [999511079-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999501193-2]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999490550-2] Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00234-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999522428]. Mailed to: Wise, Wise. [14-1947]

Appeal: 14-1947

Doc: 25

Filed: 02/03/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1947

EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES DAVENPORT,
Individually; MIKE HUSKEY, Individually; AARON A. MARTIN,
Individually; JUAN M. GARCIA, Individually; TOM VILSACK, In
his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States
Department of Agriculture; PAULA F. NICHOLLS, Individually;
DEBBIE
HOUSTON,
Individually;
CYNTHIA
I.
KERNODLE,
Individually; JOE LEONARD, In his official capacity as
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of United States
Department of Agriculture,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:13-cv-00234-BO)

Submitted:

January 16, 2015

Decided:

February 3, 2015

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Wise, Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se.
Neal
Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Gray Walker,

Appeal: 14-1947

Doc: 25

Filed: 02/03/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1947

Doc: 25

Filed: 02/03/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal
the

district

evidentiary

court’s

hearing

orders

and

granting

dismiss their civil complaint.
find

no

reversible

denying

error.

the

their

motion

Defendants’

for

an

motion

to

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

we

affirm

for

the

See Wise v. U.S. Dep’t of

Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19,
2014).

We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pauperis

but deny their other pending motions.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3