In re: William Haskin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--grant IFP. Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00072-7. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999604591].. [14-1954]

Appeal: 14-1954

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1954

In re:

WILLIAM HASKINS, a/k/a Julio, a/k/a, K.C.,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted:

May 28, 2015

Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.

and

SHEDD,

(1:95-cr-00072-7)

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

June 18, 2015

DAVIS,

Senior

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Haskins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1954

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Haskins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255

(2012)

motion.

He

seeks

an

directing the district court to act.
court’s

docket

reveals

that

the

order

from

this

court

Our review of the district
magistrate

judge

recently

entered a report and recommendation as to the disposition of
Haskins’

motion

and

Haskins

has

filed

objections

thereto.

Accordingly, because there has been recent action on Haskins’
§ 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
leave

to

proceed

in

forma

pauperis.

We

dispense

We grant
with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2