County of Grayson, Virginia v. John Spane

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00384-GEC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999613767]. [14-1969]

Appeal: 14-1969

Doc: 32

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1969

THE COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; RICHARD VAUGHN, in his
Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; THE COUNTY
OF CARROLL, VIRGINIA,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JOHN T. SPANE; DALE W. SUTPHIN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
RA-TECH SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00384-GEC)

Submitted:

June 19, 2015

Decided:

July 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cullen Dennis Seltzer, SANDS ANDERSON PC, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellants. Gregory D. Habeeb, Monica Taylor Monday,

Appeal: 14-1969

Doc: 32

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Daniel R. Sullivan, GENTRY, LOCKE,
Virginia, for Appellee John T. Spane.

RAKES

&

MOORE,

Roanoke,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-1969

Doc: 32

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Appellants

appeal

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing

their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and
Dale

W.

Sutphin.

We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by

court.

the

district

Cnty.

Of

Grayson

7:13-cv-00384-GEC (W.D. Va. May 29, 2014).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

v.

Spane,

No.

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3