In re: Larry William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999450254-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999439082-2]; terminating Motion to expedite decision [999496732-2]. Originating case number: 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498222]. Mailed to: Larry Williams. [14-1982]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1982 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1982 In re: LARRY SINCLAIR WILLIAMS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:92-cr-00083-AVB-1) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Sinclair Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1982 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Larry Sinclair Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2) (2012). He seeks an directing the district court to act. order from grant leave to mandamus petition. facts and materials legal before proceed in court We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. we this forma pauperis Accordingly, and deny the We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?