Christopher Long v. M&M Transportation, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999588598]. [14-2004]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2004 Doc: 27 Filed: 05/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2004 CHRISTOPHER TYLER LONG; CHRISTOPHER EMMETT LONG; EDY LONG, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. M&M TRANSPORTATION, LLC; MILLER & SONS AUTO AND TRUCK REPAIR, INC.; KEVIN E. MILLER; KENNETH ANDREW MILLER, JR.; PEGGY MILLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT) Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher James Regan, J. Zachary Zatezalo, Laura P. Pollard, BORDAS & BORDAS, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants. Tracey A. Rohrbaugh, Julie R. Shank, BOWLES RICE, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen M. Houghton, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2004 Doc: 27 Filed: 05/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Tyler Long, Christopher Emmett Long, and Edy Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for partial summary judgment and granting Appellees’ revised motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Long v. M&M Transp., LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 5, 2014). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?