Christopher Long v. M&M Transportation, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999588598]. [14-2004]
Appeal: 14-2004
Doc: 27
Filed: 05/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2004
CHRISTOPHER TYLER LONG; CHRISTOPHER EMMETT LONG; EDY LONG,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
M&M TRANSPORTATION, LLC; MILLER & SONS AUTO AND TRUCK
REPAIR, INC.; KEVIN E. MILLER; KENNETH ANDREW MILLER, JR.;
PEGGY MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT)
Submitted:
April 30, 2015
Decided:
May 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher James Regan, J. Zachary Zatezalo, Laura P. Pollard,
BORDAS & BORDAS, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants.
Tracey A. Rohrbaugh, Julie R. Shank, BOWLES RICE, LLP,
Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen M. Houghton, DICKIE, MCCAMEY
& CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2004
Doc: 27
Filed: 05/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Tyler Long, Christopher Emmett Long, and Edy
Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for
partial summary judgment and granting Appellees’ revised motion
for summary judgment.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and
the joint appendix and find no reversible error.
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Long v.
M&M Transp., LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 5,
2014).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?