Debra Feaster v. Federal Express Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-02517-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999555896]. Mailed to: Debra Feaster. [14-2025]

Appeal: 14-2025

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/31/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2025

DEBRA FEASTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:13-cv-02517-DCN)

Submitted:

March 24, 2015

Decided:

March 31, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se.
Lucille Lattimore Nelson,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South
Carolina; Patrick Daniel Riederer, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2025

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/31/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Debra Feaster appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment

to

Federal

Express

Corporation

on

her

claims

of

a

hostile work environment and discrimination, in violation of 42
U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012), and Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012).
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

we

affirm

for

the

reasons stated by the district court.

Feaster v. Fed. Express

Corp.,

Aug.

dispense

No.

2:13-cv-02517-DCN

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

(D.S.C.
because

presented

in

the
the

28,
facts

2014).

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2