Patrick Dayson v. Herman Lanier

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999460294-2]; denying Motion to order investigation of missing firearms [999460299-2] Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00131-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999495922]. Mailed to: Patrick Dayson. [14-2045]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2045 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/18/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2045 PATRICK MICHAEL DAYSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HERMAN MELVIN LANIER; LISA MARIE LANIER; MARK TIMOTHY SAIN; CITY OF RED LODGE, MONTANA; DANIELLE BARNES, Police Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:14-cv-00131-FL) Submitted: December 16, 2014 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Circuit Decided: December 18, 2014 Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Michael Dayson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2045 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/18/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 Michael appeals PER CURIAM: Patrick order dismissing his Dayson complaint filed (2012) for lack of jurisdiction. and find no reversible error. the under district 42 court’s U.S.C. § 1983 We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dayson v. Lanier, No. 4:14-cv-00131-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2014). We deny Dayton’s motions to expedite the decision and to order an investigation of missing firearms. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?