ESCgov, Inc. v. BMC Software, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01344-GBL-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999546273].. [14-2054]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2054 Doc: 28 Filed: 03/16/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2054 ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01344-GBL-TCB) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher A. Abel, Stephanie N. Gilbert, D. Sutton Hirschler, III, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Benjamin G. Chew, Nigel L. Wilkinson, Joshua N. Drian, MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Michael Guiffré, SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2054 Doc: 28 Filed: 03/16/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: ESCgov, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of BMC Software, Inc., on its claims for breach of contract, tortious interference contract, civil conspiracy, and statutory conspiracy. with a We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the See ESCgov, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-1344, 2014 WL 3891660 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2014). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?