In re: Anthony Blagrove

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [999450544-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999450545-2]. Originating case number: 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498229]. Mailed to: Anthony Blagrove. [14-2057]

Appeal: 14-2057

Doc: 7

Filed: 12/22/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2057

In re: ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1)

Submitted:

December 18, 2014

Decided:

December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Blagrove, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2057

Doc: 7

Filed: 12/22/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony A. Blagrove petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his “Jurisdictional Question” filed on April 23, 2012.

He seeks

an order from this court directing the district court to act.
Our

review

of

the

district

court’s

docket

reveals

that

the

filing was not docketed as a motion.

In any event, the district

court

Blagrove’s

has

argument

sufficiently

in

a

addressed

subsequent

order

entered

on

jurisdictional

March

Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
leave

to

proceed

in

forma

pauperis.

We

dispense

10,

2014.

We grant
with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2