Charles Carter v. Baltimore City Police Dept.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999450841-2] Originating case number: 1:04-cv-03842-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999554124]. Mailed to: Charles Carter. [14-2059]

Appeal: 14-2059

Doc: 9

Filed: 03/27/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2059

CHARLES H. CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
LOUIS
HOPSON;
ZEINAB
RABOLD;
JOHN
M.
MACK;
JACQUES
BONAPARTE; MELVIN RUSSELL; CHRISTINE BOYD; CARLOS PERRY;
ANTHONY GOODE; LESLIE EDWARDS; MICHAEL FARRAR; EDWARD
TINDEL; LYNELL GREEN; SHIRLEY ONYANGO; ANTHONY ELLISON;
EXDOL WILLIAMS; MICHAEL EDWARDS; ERICA FOOTE; ANTOINE
TRAVERS; KAREN ALSTON; MAURICE PRICE; LOUIS H. HOPSON, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
BALTIMORE, a municipal corporation of the State of Maryland,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CITY OF BALTIMORE; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Mayor of the City of
Baltimore; LEONARD HAMM, Police Commissioner for the City of
Baltimore; EDWARD T. NORRIS, JR., Former Police Commissioner
for the City of Baltimore; THOMAS FRAZIER, Former Police
Commissioner for the City of Baltimore; SEAN R. MALONE,
Labor Commissioner for the City of Baltimore; MARIA KORMAN,
Trial
Board
Counsel
for
the
Baltimore
City
Police
Department; GARY MAY, Former Legal Affairs Director for the
Baltimore
City
Police
Department,
in
their
official
capacities; LEONARD D. HAMM, Acting Police Commissioner,
Defendants.

Appeal: 14-2059

Doc: 9

Filed: 03/27/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:04-cv-03842-WDQ)

Submitted:

March 19, 2015

Decided:

March 27, 2015

Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles H. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Gary Gilkey, Assistant
Solicitor, Suzanne Sangree, George Albert Nilson, BALTIMORE CITY
LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-2059

Doc: 9

Filed: 03/27/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Charles

H.

Carter

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
Carter’s motion, which was construed as a motion for contempt in
relation to a settlement agreement that the court had previously
approved.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

See Carter v. Baltimore City Police Dep’t, No.

1:04-cv-03842-WDQ

(D.

Md.

Sept.

16,

2014).

We

grant

Carter

leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3