Adaobi Stella Obioha v. Eric Holder, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999620833-2] Originating case number: A028-955-050 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999675433].. [14-2065]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2065 Doc: 40 Filed: 10/09/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2065 ADAOBI STELLA OBIOHA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 14, 2015 Decided: October 9, 2015 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy W. Davis, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY W. DAVIS, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Blair T. O’Connor, Assistant Director, Briena L. Strippoli, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2065 Doc: 40 Filed: 10/09/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Adaobi Stella Obioha, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motions to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Obioha’s claims * and find no abuse of discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. re: Obioha (B.I.A. Sept. 8, 2014). remand. legal before See In We deny Obioha’s motion to We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITION DENIED * Obioha does not challenge the Board’s finding that she failed to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture, the Board’s denial of her 2013 motion to reopen, or the Board’s refusal to sua sponte reopen proceedings. She has therefore abandoned these claims on appeal. See Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?