Adaobi Stella Obioha v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999620833-2] Originating case number: A028-955-050 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999675433].. [14-2065]
Appeal: 14-2065
Doc: 40
Filed: 10/09/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2065
ADAOBI STELLA OBIOHA,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
September 14, 2015
Decided:
October 9, 2015
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy W. Davis, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY W. DAVIS, LLC,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer,
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Blair T. O’Connor,
Assistant Director, Briena L. Strippoli, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2065
Doc: 40
Filed: 10/09/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Adaobi
Stella
Obioha,
a
native
and
citizen
of
Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motions to reopen.
We have reviewed
the administrative record and Obioha’s claims * and find no abuse
of discretion.
See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992)
(setting forth standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
re: Obioha (B.I.A. Sept. 8, 2014).
remand.
legal
before
See In
We deny Obioha’s motion to
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
*
Obioha does not challenge the Board’s finding that she
failed to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief under
the Convention Against Torture, the Board’s denial of her 2013
motion to reopen, or the Board’s refusal to sua sponte reopen
proceedings.
She has therefore abandoned these claims on
appeal.
See Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49
(4th Cir. 2013).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?