Courtnay Brissett v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00243-D Copies to all parties and the district court. [999571943]. Mailed to: Courtnay Brissett & Ladwin Brissett. [14-2089]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2089 Doc: 30 Filed: 04/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2089 COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; PATRICIA R. CALLAHAN; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROLINA EAST REALTY, a/k/a Carolina East Realty, LLC; TRIPP BLADFORD, a/k/a Royston D. Blandford, III, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00243-D) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Courtnay T. Brissett, Ladwin Brissett, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Wayne Jones, Jesse Andrew Schaefer, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ryal Woodall Tayloe, WARD & SMITH, PA, Wilmington, North Carolina; Donald Kirkman Phillips, Stuart Lee Stroud, WALLACE, MORRIS, BARWICK, LANDIS & STROUD, PA, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2089 Doc: 30 Filed: 04/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Courtnay T. Brissett and Ladwin Brissett appeal district court’s order dismissing their civil action. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for Brissett v. (E.D.N.C. Sept. the Wells 26, reasons Fargo 2014). stated Bank, We by N.A., dispense the with We have Accordingly, district No. the court. 4:13-cv-00243-D oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?