Courtnay Brissett v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00243-D Copies to all parties and the district court. [999571943]. Mailed to: Courtnay Brissett & Ladwin Brissett. [14-2089]
Appeal: 14-2089
Doc: 30
Filed: 04/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2089
COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; PATRICIA R. CALLAHAN; CHICAGO TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROLINA EAST REALTY, a/k/a Carolina East
Realty, LLC; TRIPP BLADFORD, a/k/a Royston D. Blandford,
III,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00243-D)
Submitted:
April 23, 2015
Decided:
April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtnay T. Brissett, Ladwin Brissett, Appellants Pro Se.
Christopher Wayne Jones, Jesse Andrew Schaefer, WOMBLE CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ryal Woodall
Tayloe, WARD & SMITH, PA, Wilmington, North Carolina; Donald
Kirkman Phillips, Stuart Lee Stroud, WALLACE, MORRIS, BARWICK,
LANDIS & STROUD, PA, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2089
Doc: 30
Filed: 04/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Courtnay
T.
Brissett
and
Ladwin
Brissett
appeal
district court’s order dismissing their civil action.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
Brissett
v.
(E.D.N.C.
Sept.
the
Wells
26,
reasons
Fargo
2014).
stated
Bank,
We
by
N.A.,
dispense
the
with
We have
Accordingly,
district
No.
the
court.
4:13-cv-00243-D
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?