Starsha Sewell v. Strayer University

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-02927-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court. [999543591]. Mailed to: Starsha Sewell. [14-2123]

Appeal: 14-2123

Doc: 11

Filed: 03/11/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2123

STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STRAYER UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02927-DKC)

Submitted:

February 24, 2015

Decided:

March 11, 2015

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, Joleen
Okun, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2123

Doc: 11

Filed: 03/11/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying
her

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

60(b)

Sewell

v.

and

Strayer

find

for

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.

record

motions

reversible error.
district

the

her

We

the

reviewed

and

reconsideration.

by

have

motion

Univ.,

no

No.

8:12-cv-02927-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3,
2014).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2