David Ruby v. Mykal Ryan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00108-MSD-TEM,08-50805-FJS,10-05026-FJS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999538607]. Mailed to: David Ruby. [14-2140]

Appeal: 14-2140

Doc: 12

Filed: 03/03/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2140

DAVID R. RUBY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HELEN E. RYAN, MYKAL S. RYAN,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
JUDY ROBBINS, U.S. TRUSTEE,
Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:14-cv-00108-MSD-TEM)

Submitted:

February 25, 2015

Decided:

March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helen E. Ryan, Mykal S. Ryan, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2140

Doc: 12

Filed: 03/03/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Helen E. Ryan and Mykal S. Ryan seek to appeal the district
court’s order directing them to show cause why their appeal from
the

bankruptcy

court’s

failure to prosecute.
over

final

orders

should

not

be

dismissed

for

This court may exercise jurisdiction only

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1291

(2012),

and

certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
is

neither

a

final

order

The order the Ryans seek to appeal

nor

an

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2