Lydia Charles v. Patrick Donahoe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999484153-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549246]. Mailed to: Lydia Charles. [14-2171]

Appeal: 14-2171

Doc: 8

Filed: 03/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2171

LYDIA A. CHARLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC)

Submitted:

March 17, 2015

Decided:

March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lydia A. Charles, Appellant Pro Se.
Gill Paul Beck, Sr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2171

Doc: 8

Filed: 03/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal
Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012).

We have reviewed the record and

find

Accordingly,

no

reversible

error.

although

we

grant

Charles leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.

Charles v. Donahoe, No.

3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2