George Evans v. Guilford County Detention
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00499-NCT-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999662716]. Mailed to: Evans. [14-2174]
Appeal: 14-2174
Doc: 31
Filed: 09/18/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2174
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; B. J. BARNES; SGT.
LANIER; OFFICER MANGUM; GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00499-NCT-JEP)
Submitted:
August 18, 2015
Decided:
September 18, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Reynold Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Livingston
Mason, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina; John Mark Payne, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2174
Doc: 31
Filed: 09/18/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
George Reynold Evans seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation in this action filed under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
Beneficial
Indus.
Loan
Corp.,
337
U.S.
541,
The order Evans seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
According to the district court’s docket sheet, Evans has
filed
objections
to
the
magistrate
judge’s
report
and
recommendation.
However, the district court has not yet ruled
on the ojections or issued a final order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?