Roy Krieger v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999561864].. [14-2176]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2176 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/09/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2176 ROY WALTER KRIEGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; WARREN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; JENNIFER DOYLE, Defendants - Appellees, and LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW) Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 9, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Walter Krieger, Appellant Pro Se. Mikie F. Melis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Heather Appeal: 14-2176 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/09/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Kathleen Bardot, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. HORVATH & JUDKINS, PC, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-2176 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/09/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Roy Walter Krieger appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Krieger’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint with prejudice. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krieger v. Commonwealth of Va., Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2014). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?