Roy Krieger v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999561864].. [14-2176]
Appeal: 14-2176
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/09/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2176
ROY WALTER KRIEGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES;
LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; WARREN COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; JENNIFER DOYLE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW)
Submitted:
March 27, 2015
Decided:
April 9, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Walter Krieger, Appellant Pro Se. Mikie F. Melis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Heather
Appeal: 14-2176
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/09/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Kathleen Bardot, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
HORVATH
&
JUDKINS,
PC,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-2176
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/09/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Roy
Walter
Krieger
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing Krieger’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint with prejudice.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Krieger v. Commonwealth of Va.,
Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Sept.
30, 2014).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?