Sheena Hunt v. Brooks Run Mining Company, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00433. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999630181]. [14-2184]
Appeal: 14-2184
Doc: 22
Filed: 07/29/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2184
SHEENA HUNT, Individually and as the Administratrix of the
Estate of; RUSSELL AARON HUNT, Deceased,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
BROOKS RUN
Company,
MINING
COMPANY,
LLC,
a
Limited
Liability
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00433)
Submitted:
June 30, 2015
Decided:
July 29, 2015
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Akers II, AKERS LAW OFFICES, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellants. Gretchen M. Callas, JACKSON KELLY
PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2184
Doc: 22
Filed: 07/29/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sheena
Hunt
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting
summary judgment in favor of Brooks Run Mining Company in Hunt’s
action under W. Va. Code Ann. § 23-4-2 (LexisNexis 2010). *
We
have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
Co.,
No.
dispense
1:13-cv-00433
with
contentions
are
oral
(S.D.
argument
adequately
W.
affirm
for
the
Hunt v. Brooks Run Mining
Va.
Sept.
30,
2014).
the
facts
and
legal
materials
before
because
presented
we
in
the
We
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The statute recently was amended. See 2015 W. Va. Legis.
Serv. 243.
We applied the prior version of the statute to the
facts of this case.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?