Robert Broughton, Jr. v. John McClain, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999491401-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00454-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999493617]. Mailed to: Broughton. [14-2187]

Appeal: 14-2187

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/16/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2187

ROBERT BAIN BROUGHTON, JR.; CELESTE G. BROUGHTON,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR.; ROBERT GALEY; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00454-H)

Submitted:

December 12, 2014

Decided:

December 16, 2014

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert B. Broughton, Jr., Celeste G. Broughton, Appellants Pro
Se. William Sidney Aldridge, NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Raleigh,
North Carolina; Debbie Weston Harden, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE &
RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2187

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/16/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robert

D.

Broughton,

Jr.

and

Celeste

G.

Broughton

appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint
and denying reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and

find

Accordingly,

no

reversible

error.

reasons stated by the district court.

we

affirm

for

the

Broughton v. McClain, No.

5:13-cv-00454-H (E.D.N.C. July 22 & Sept. 29, 2014).

We also

deny the Appellants’ motion for an injunction.

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2