Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney General

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999498626-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03298-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530024]. Mailed to: Catherine Randolph. [14-2193]

Appeal: 14-2193

Doc: 9

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2193

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al; NEW TECHNOLOGY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv—03298-GLR)

Submitted:

February 12, 2015

Decided:

February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2193

Doc: 9

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to
state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).

We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly,

we

dismiss

deny

appeal

leave
for

the

to

proceed

reasons

in

forma

stated

by

pauperis
the

and

district

court.

the
See

Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:14-cv-03298-GLR (D. Md. Oct.
30, 2014).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2