Tomas Mahari v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-257-229 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999617422].. [14-2201]
Appeal: 14-2201
Doc: 25
Filed: 07/09/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2201
TOMAS MULUGHETA MAHARI,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
June 17, 2015
Decided:
July 9, 2015
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hudaidah Bhimdi Ahmed, FAYAD LAW P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for
Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Acting Assistant Attorney General,
Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Sara J. Bayram, OFFICE OF
IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2201
Doc: 25
Filed: 07/09/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tomas Mulugheta Mahari, a native of Saudi Arabia and a citizen
of Eritrea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
Immigration
Judge’s
denial
withholding
of
removal.
dismissing
of
his
We
his
appeal
requests
have
from
the
asylum
and
reviewed
the
for
thoroughly
administrative record and Mahari’s contentions on appeal, and
conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision.
See
INS
v.
Elias-Zacarias,
502
U.S.
478,
481
(1992).
We
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by
the Board.
See In re: Mahari (B.I.A. Oct. 3, 2014).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?