Tomas Mahari v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-257-229 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999617422].. [14-2201]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2201 Doc: 25 Filed: 07/09/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2201 TOMAS MULUGHETA MAHARI, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 17, 2015 Decided: July 9, 2015 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hudaidah Bhimdi Ahmed, FAYAD LAW P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Sara J. Bayram, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2201 Doc: 25 Filed: 07/09/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tomas Mulugheta Mahari, a native of Saudi Arabia and a citizen of Eritrea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) Immigration Judge’s denial withholding of removal. dismissing of his We his appeal requests have from the asylum and reviewed the for thoroughly administrative record and Mahari’s contentions on appeal, and conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Mahari (B.I.A. Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?