Homesite Insurance Company v. Kyle Raley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00199-CMH-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999613067]. [14-2207]
Appeal: 14-2207
Doc: 25
Filed: 07/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2207
HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KYLE RALEY,
Defendant – Appellant,
and
PATRICK STAPLETON; MIKAL STAPLETON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00199-CMH-TCB)
Submitted:
June 19, 2015
Decided:
July 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark T. Foley, SASSCER, CLAGETT & BUCHER, Upper Marlboro,
Maryland, for Appellant. Robert M. Hardy, JORDAN COYNE LLP,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2207
Doc: 25
Filed: 07/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kyle
Raley
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order
granting default judgment against his co-defendants.
This court
may
28
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
orders,
U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b);
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Raley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
The case is still
ongoing
no
against
Raley,
as
there
has
been
order
entered
dismissing him from the suit or entering judgment for or against
him.
Accordingly,
jurisdiction.
we
dismiss
the
appeal
for
lack
of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?