Linda Sanders v. Deerfield Episcopal Retirement

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999513011].. [14-2210]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2210 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2210 LINDA SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEERFIELD EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and DEERFIELD E. RETIREMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH) Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Woodward Yarbrough, CONSTANGY BROOKS & SMITH, LLP, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 14-2210 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-2210 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/20/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Linda Sanders appeals from the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action without prejudice for failure to perfect service in a timely manner on Defendant Episcopal Retirement Community, Incorporated. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons Deerfield stated Episcopal by the We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm district Retirement Deerfield court. Cmty., Sanders Inc., v. No. 1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?