Linda Sanders v. Deerfield Episcopal Retirement
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999513011].. [14-2210]
Appeal: 14-2210
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2210
LINDA SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEERFIELD EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DEERFIELD E. RETIREMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH)
Submitted:
January 15, 2015
Decided:
January 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Woodward Yarbrough,
CONSTANGY BROOKS & SMITH, LLP, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 14-2210
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-2210
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/20/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Linda Sanders appeals from the district court’s order
adopting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing her civil action without prejudice for failure to
perfect
service
in
a
timely
manner
on
Defendant
Episcopal Retirement Community, Incorporated.
the record and find no reversible error.
for
the
reasons
Deerfield
stated
Episcopal
by
the
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
district
Retirement
Deerfield
court.
Cmty.,
Sanders
Inc.,
v.
No.
1:13-cv-00202-MOC-DLH (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2014).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?