Alecia Farley v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00568-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999539605]. Mailed to: Alecia and Marvin Farley. [14-2215]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2215 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/04/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2215 ALECIA Y. FARLEY; MARVIN A. FARLEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00568-JRS) Submitted: February 18, 2015 Decided: March 4, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alecia Y. Farley; Marvin A. Farley, Appellants Pro Se. Michael T. Hosmer, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2215 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/04/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alecia Y. Farley and Marvin A. Farley seek to appeal the district court’s order ruling on several pretrial motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order the Farleys seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?