Alecia Farley v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00568-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999539605]. Mailed to: Alecia and Marvin Farley. [14-2215]
Appeal: 14-2215
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/04/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2215
ALECIA Y. FARLEY; MARVIN A. FARLEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor
by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00568-JRS)
Submitted:
February 18, 2015
Decided:
March 4, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alecia Y. Farley; Marvin A. Farley, Appellants Pro Se. Michael
T. Hosmer, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2215
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/04/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alecia Y. Farley and Marvin A. Farley seek to appeal the
district
court’s
order
ruling
on
several
pretrial
motions.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The
order the Farleys seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?