Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01372-LO-TRJ,1:14-cv-01373-LO-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999512806]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-2216]

Appeal: 14-2216

Doc: 10

Filed: 01/20/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2216

HARALD SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVEN HUNSBERGER; JOHN BURK,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01372-LO-TRJ; 1:14-cv-01373-LO-TRJ).

Submitted:

January 15, 2015

Decided:

January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harald
Schmidt,
Appellant
Pro
Se.
Jeffrey
Notz,
COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2216

Doc: 10

Filed: 01/20/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Harald Schmidt seeks to appeal the district court’s
order

consolidating

his

two

civil

actions.

This

court

may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),

and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus.

Loan

Schmidt

Corp.,

seeks

to

337

U.S.

appeal

is

541,

545-46

neither

a

(1949).
final

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

The

order

order

nor

an

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2