US v. Edward Zinner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00399-RGD-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999613847]. [14-2218]

Appeal: 14-2218

Doc: 27

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2218

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWARD R. ZINNER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00399-RGD-TEM)

Submitted:

June 23, 2015

Decided:

July 2, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin D. Miller, LAW OFFICES OF MARVIN D. MILLER, Alexandria,
Virginia; Louis Napoleon Joynes, II, JOYNES & GAIDIES, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, for Appellant.
Dana J. Boente, United States
Attorney, Mark A. Exley, Assistant United States Attorney,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2218

Doc: 27

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edward R. Zinner appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing

his

jurisdiction.
as

well

as

civil

action

for

lack

of

subject

matter

We have reviewed the record included on appeal,
the

parties’

district court’s ruling.

briefs,

and

find

no

error

in

the

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

United States v. Zinner, No.

2:14-cv-00399-RGD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2014).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2