Martin P. Sheehan v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00125-JPB,1:10-bk-00813 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999634671].. [14-2257]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2257 Doc: 26 Filed: 08/05/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2257 In Re: JACQUELINE RHEA SHAVER, Debtor. -------------------------------MARTIN P. SHEEHAN, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00125-JPB; 1:10-bk-00813) Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: August 5, 2015 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martin P. Sheehan, SHEEHAN & NUGENT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Monica E. Webb, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2257 Doc: 26 Filed: 08/05/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Martin P. Sheehan, the trustee in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order: (1) granting summary judgment in favor of Bank of America, N.A., and (2) denying his request to certify a question to the West Virginia Supreme Court. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Shaver (Sheehan v. Bank of America, N.A.), No. 1:14-cv-00125-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?