Eugene Holmes v. State of North Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00570-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999546139]. Mailed to: Holmes. [14-2270]

Appeal: 14-2270

Doc: 5

Filed: 03/16/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2270

EUGENE SHERLOCK HOLMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROY COOPER, as Administrator of the
Estate of Attorney General for the State of North Carolina;
ALL MEDIA T.V. STATIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00570-FDW-DSC)

Submitted:

March 12, 2015

Decided:

March 16, 2015

Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2270

Doc: 5

Filed: 03/16/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eugene Sherlock Holmes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous
and for failure to state a claim.

On appeal, we confine our

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th

Cir.

in

R.

34(b).

Because

Holmes

does

not

challenge

his

informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition,
he

has

forfeited

Accordingly,
dispense

we

with

contentions

are

appellate

affirm
oral

the

of

district

argument

adequately

review

court’s

because

presented

the

in

the
the

court’s

order.

judgment.

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2