Julian Harman v. Commissioner Social Security

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:13-cv-01728-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639725].. [14-2287]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2287 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/13/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2287 JULIAN HARMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:13-cv-01728-TMC) Submitted: July 30, 2015 Before KING and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 13, 2015 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. W. Daniel Mayes, SMITH, MASSEY, BRODIE, GUYNN, & MAYES, P.A., Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Hugh Dun Rappaport, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts; Marshall Prince, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2287 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/13/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Julian Harman appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment for the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harman v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:13-cv-01728-TMC (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?