Donald Van Meter v. JM & LF Inc

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999567605]. Mailed to: Meter. [14-2298]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2298 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2298 DONALD VAN METER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JM & LF INC., d/b/a Action Automotive, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Se. William Edward Hassan, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2298 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Donald Van Meter seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting judgment. the Defendant’s motion to set aside default This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Van Meter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Nor could it have been certified for immediate appealability under Rule 54(b). In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992). appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?