Donald Van Meter v. JM & LF Inc
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999567605]. Mailed to: Meter. [14-2298]
Appeal: 14-2298
Doc: 13
Filed: 04/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2298
DONALD VAN METER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JM & LF INC., d/b/a Action Automotive,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Theresa C. Buchanan,
Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB)
Submitted:
April 16, 2015
Decided:
April 20, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Se.
William
Edward
Hassan,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2298
Doc: 13
Filed: 04/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Van Meter seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order
granting
judgment.
the
Defendant’s
motion
to
set
aside
default
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
The order Van Meter seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Nor could it have been certified for immediate appealability
under Rule 54(b).
In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir.
2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973
F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992).
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?