Deborah Hyatt v. Prudential Insurance Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00035-MR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999756253].. [14-2305]
Appeal: 14-2305
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/17/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2305
DEBORAH A. HYATT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA; THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC,
INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN; THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00035-MR)
Submitted:
January 22, 2016
Decided:
February 17, 2016
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter E. Daniels III, DANIELS LAW FIRM, PC, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Ian H. Morrison, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP,
Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2305
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/17/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
Hyatt
the
PER CURIAM:
Deborah
A.
appeals
district
court’s
order
dismissing, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), her civil action
seeking
relief
pursuant
to
the
Employee
Retirement
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended.
Income
On appeal, Hyatt
raises two issues: (1) whether her complaint was timely filed
according
to
the
plain
language
of
the
ERISA
plan;
and
(2)
whether an ambiguity existed in the ERISA plan language that
rendered
the
erroneous.
error.
granting
of
Prudential’s
motion
to
dismiss
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Hyatt v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., No. 1:14-
cv-00035-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?