Deborah Hyatt v. Prudential Insurance Company
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00035-MR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [14-2305]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DEBORAH A. HYATT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA; THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC,
INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN; THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00035-MR)
January 22, 2016
February 17, 2016
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter E. Daniels III, DANIELS LAW FIRM, PC, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Ian H. Morrison, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP,
Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
dismissing, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), her civil action
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended.
On appeal, Hyatt
raises two issues: (1) whether her complaint was timely filed
whether an ambiguity existed in the ERISA plan language that
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Hyatt v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., No. 1:14-
cv-00035-MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?