Heydi De Leon Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-571-967. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999604779].. [14-2325]

Appeal: 14-2325

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2325

HEYDI YUVISSA DE LEON MARTINEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

June 12, 2015

Decided:

June 18, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia I. Klingenberg, LAW OFFICE OF PATRICIA I. KLINGENBERG,
San Diego, California, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer,
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr.,
Assistant Director, D. Nicholas Harling, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2325

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Heydi Yuvissa De Leon Martinez, a native and citizen of
Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration

Appeals

immigration

judge’s

withholding
Against

(“Board”)

of

denial

removal,

Torture.

We

and
have

dismissing
of

her

her

appeal

requests

from

for

protection

under

the

thoroughly

reviewed

the

asylum,

Convention

the

record,

including the transcript of De Leon Martinez’s merits hearing
and

all

supporting

evidence

does

not

evidence.
compel

a

We
ruling

conclude
contrary

that
to

the
any

record
of

the

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2012),

and

decision.

that

substantial

supports

the

Board’s

See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly,
reasons

evidence

stated

we

by

deny

the

(B.I.A. Nov. 4, 2014).

the

petition

Board.

See

In

for
re:

review
De

Leon

for

the

Martinez

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2