John Stritzinger v. Bank of America

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999789805-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999781273-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999770984-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999783813-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-02409-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999828808]. Mailed to: Stritzinger. [14-2356]

Appeal: 14-2356

Doc: 28

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2356

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA; VERNON WRIGHT,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (3:14-cv-02409-TLW)

Submitted:

May 18, 2016

Decided:

May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2356

Doc: 28

Filed: 05/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John
adopting

S.
the

Stritzinger
magistrate

appeals
judge’s

the

district

recommendation

court’s
and

order

dismissing

his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a
court order. *
raised

in

Because
basis

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues

the

Appellant’s

Stritzinger’s

for

the

brief.

informal

district

brief

court’s

See

4th

does

Cir.

not

disposition,

R.

34(b).

challenge

the

Stritzinger

has

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly,

we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny
the motion to remand, and affirm the district court’s judgment.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

appeal.

We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of
See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

2