In re: Jill Parrish

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999518974-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00856-CCE,14-10681. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999592534]. Mailed to: Jill Parrish. [14-2386, 14-2387]

Appeal: 14-2386

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/29/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2386

In Re:

JILL PARRISH,
Debtor.

-----------------------------------JILL PARRISH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WILLIAM P. MILLER,
Party-in-Interest,
ANITA JO TROXLER,
Trustee.

No. 14-2387

In Re:

JILL HEDGECOCK PARRISH,
Debtor.

------------------------------------

Appeal: 14-2386

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/29/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

JILL PARRISH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM P. MILLER, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ANITA JO TROXLER,
Trustee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00856-CCE; 1:14-cv-00916-CCE; 14-10681)

Submitted:

May 15, 2015

Before WILKINSON and
Senior Circuit Judge.

Decided:

NIEMEYER,

Circuit

Judges,

May 29, 2015

and

HAMILTON,

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jill Parrish, Appellant Pro Se.
Pamela P. Keenan, KIRSCHBAUM,
NANNEY, KEENAN & GRIFFIN, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert
Edmunds Price, Jr., UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATOR,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-2386

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/29/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Jill Parrish appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
her

appeals

from

the

bankruptcy

court’s

orders

granting

a

creditor relief from the automatic stay in her bankruptcy case
and

denying

bankruptcy
bankruptcy

her

request

court
case

on

relief.

this

a

hardship

subsequently
an

basis

discharge.

dismissed

appealed that dismissal.
dismissed,

for

court

unrelated

and

the

The

underlying

Parrish

has

not

Because the bankruptcy case has been
cannot

afford

Parrish

any

effective

See In re Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st

Cir. 1990) (“Absent a stay, the court must dismiss a pending
appeal as moot because the court has no remedy that it can
fashion

even

differently.”).

if

it

would

have

determined

argument

adequately

issues

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss these appeals as moot.
oral

the

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

3