Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--terminating Motion to strike [999550544-2]; denying Motion to strike [999546647-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999571899].. [14-2394]

Appeal: 14-2394

Doc: 16

Filed: 04/27/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2394

JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JULIE GARRISON,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC)

Submitted:

April 23, 2015

Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se.
Richard
Caldarone,
Joan
Iris
Oppenheimer,
UNITED
STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2394

Doc: 16

Filed: 04/27/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jesse

G.

Yates,

III,

and

Melissa

Long

Yates

appeal

the

district court’s order denying relief on their complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and related claims.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Yates

v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014).
We

deny

the

Yateses’

motion

to

strike

the

informal

response

brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2