Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics Incorporated
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00684-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999638111]. Mailed to: Rhonda Meisner. [14-2396]
Appeal: 14-2396
Doc: 36
Filed: 08/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2396
RHONDA MEISNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ZYMOGENETICS INCORPORATED, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Bristol-Myers Squibb; TRACEY CALDERAZZO; ZYMOGENETICS LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary of ZymoGenetics, Inc,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00684-CMC)
Submitted:
July 28, 2015
Decided:
August 11, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie E. Lewis, Jonathan
A. Roth, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2396
Doc: 36
Filed: 08/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rhonda Meisner appeals the district court’s order accepting
the
recommendation
judgment
to
of
the
Appellees,
magistrate
and
judge,
affirming
the
granting
summary
magistrate
judge’s
denial of her motion to amend in her action alleging employment
discrimination
and
related
state-law
claims.
Meisner
also
appeals the district court’s orders denying her Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion and taxing costs to her.
record and find no reversible error.
the
reasons
ZymoGenetics,
stated
by
Inc.,
No.
the
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
district
court.
3:12-cv-00684-CMC
2014; Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 2, 2014).
(D.S.C.
Meisner
v.
Sept.
22,
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?