Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00684-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999638111]. Mailed to: Rhonda Meisner. [14-2396]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2396 Doc: 36 Filed: 08/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2396 RHONDA MEISNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ZYMOGENETICS INCORPORATED, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb; TRACEY CALDERAZZO; ZYMOGENETICS LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of ZymoGenetics, Inc, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00684-CMC) Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: August 11, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie E. Lewis, Jonathan A. Roth, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2396 Doc: 36 Filed: 08/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rhonda Meisner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation judgment to of the Appellees, magistrate and judge, affirming the granting summary magistrate judge’s denial of her motion to amend in her action alleging employment discrimination and related state-law claims. Meisner also appeals the district court’s orders denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion and taxing costs to her. record and find no reversible error. the reasons ZymoGenetics, stated by Inc., No. the We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for district court. 3:12-cv-00684-CMC 2014; Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 2, 2014). (D.S.C. Meisner v. Sept. 22, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?