Catherine Randolph v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03609-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549129]. Mailed to: Catherine Randolph. [14-2397]
Appeal: 14-2397
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2397
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES; NEW TECHNOLOGY HOME-BROADCASTING BUSINESS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-03609-JFM)
Submitted:
March 17, 2015
Decided:
March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2397
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to
state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Randolph v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-03609-JFM (D. Md.
Dec. 12, 2014).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?