Catherine Randolph v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03609-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549129]. Mailed to: Catherine Randolph. [14-2397]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-2397 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2397 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; NEW TECHNOLOGY HOME-BROADCASTING BUSINESS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-03609-JFM) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-2397 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-03609-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 12, 2014). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?