Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. DOWCP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 14-0124,14-0124A. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639701]. [14-2407]
Appeal: 14-2407
Doc: 47
Filed: 08/13/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2407
CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ANTHONY K. WALLACE; TARTAN
TERMINALS,
INCORPORATED;
AMERICAN
LONGSHORE
MUTUAL
ASSOCIATION, LTD.,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(14-0124; 14-0124A)
Submitted:
July 31, 2015
Decided:
August 13, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence P. Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner.
Heather H. Kraus, SEMMES, BOWEN, and SEMMES,
Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Marlin Wysong, BERMAN, SOBIN,
GROSS, FELDMAN & DARBY, LLP, Lutherville, Maryland; Kathleen
Kim, Mark A. Reinhalter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-2407
Doc: 47
Filed: 08/13/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., seeks review of the Benefits
Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative
law judge’s (“ALJ”) order finding that Ceres is the employer
responsible for payment of temporary total disability benefits
to Anthony K. Wallace, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012).
Our review of the record discloses that the ALJ and the Board
applied the proper legal standard, and the ALJ’s decision is
based
upon
substantial
petition for review.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
evidence.
Accordingly,
we
deny
the
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?