US v. Prentise Wilkin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00075-D-3 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999592490]. [14-4584]
Appeal: 14-4584
Doc: 43
Filed: 05/29/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-4584
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PRENTISE JAVAUGHN WILKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00075-D-3)
Submitted:
May 26, 2015
Decided:
May 29, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lewis A. Thompson, III, BANZET, THOMPSON & STYERS, PLLC,
Warrenton, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Thomas G. Walker,
United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Yvonne V.
Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-4584
Doc: 43
Filed: 05/29/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Prentise
Javaughn
Wilkins
appeals
his
sentence
of
276
months (60 months for Count 1 and 216 months consecutively for
Count 2) following his guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement
to two counts of use of a firearm during and in relation to a
crime
of
violence
Government
under
argues
that
18
U.S.C.
Wilkins’
§
924(c)(1)
appeal
of
(2012).
his
The
sentence
is
foreclosed by his waiver of appeal rights in his plea agreement.
For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal.
A criminal defendant may waive the right to appeal if that
waiver is knowing and intelligent.
492 F.3d 263, 270 (4th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Poindexter,
Generally, if the district
court fully questions a defendant regarding the waiver of his
right to appeal during a plea colloquy performed in accordance
with
Fed.
R.
Crim.
P.
11,
the
waiver
is
both
valid
and
enforceable.
United States v. Johnson, 410 F.3d 137, 151 (4th
Cir. 2005).
Whether a defendant validly waived his right to
appeal is a question of law this court reviews de novo.
United
States v. Blick, 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005).
Where the Government seeks to enforce an appeal waiver and
there is no claim that it breached its obligations under the
plea
agreement,
establishes
that
we
will
the
enforce
defendant
the
waiver
knowingly
and
if
the
record
intelligently
agreed to waive the right to appeal and the issue being appealed
2
Appeal: 14-4584
Doc: 43
Filed: 05/29/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
is within the scope of the waiver.
Id. at 169.
Upon review of
the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that Wilkins
knowingly
and
voluntarily
waived
the
right
to
appeal
his
sentence, except for circumstances not extant in this appeal,
and the issue he raises falls within the scope of the waiver.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of Wilkins’ sentence.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?