US v. Darrian Jarrell Abbott
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00426-CCE-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999712394].. [14-4764]
Appeal: 14-4764
Doc: 32
Filed: 12/04/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-4764
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARRIAN JARRELL ABBOTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:13-cr-00426-CCE-1)
Submitted:
November 13, 2015
Decided:
December 4, 2015
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Mireille P. Clough,
Assistant
Federal
Public
Defender,
Winston-Salem,
North
Carolina, for Appellant.
Ripley Rand, United States Attorney,
Robert
A.J.
Lang,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-4764
Doc: 32
Filed: 12/04/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Darrian Jarrell Abbott appeals from his 180-month sentence
imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to one count of possession
of ammunition by a felon.
He was sentenced as an armed career
criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012), based in part on a
North
Carolina
conviction
for
Larceny
from
the
Person.
On
appeal, both parties agree that Larceny from the Person is no
longer a qualifying offense under § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) after the
Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct.
2551
(2015).
Accordingly,
remand for resentencing.
we
vacate
Abbott’s
sentence
and
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?