US v. Samuel Crook

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530115].. [14-4799, 14-4801]

Appeal: 14-4799

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4799

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge.
(3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOCDSC-1)

Submitted:

February 12, 2015

Decided:

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

February 18, 2015

Appeal: 14-4799

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Paul Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy
Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-4799

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Cook appeals the district court’s orders
denying his pro se motion requesting that his 2005 plea of not
guilty by reason of insanity be withdrawn.
record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.
Crook,

Nos.

(W.D.N.C.

3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1;

Sept.

16,

2014).

We

We have reviewed the

United States v.

3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3