Steven Barnes v. Carol Thueme
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-02349-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999308638]. Mailed to: Barnes. [14-6011]
Appeal: 14-6011
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/05/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6011
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROL G.
OFFICE,
THUEME,
Court
Reporter;
COURT
ADMINISTRATION
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (5:13-cv-02349-RMG)
Submitted:
February 27, 2014
Decided:
March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6011
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/05/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Steven
Louis
Barnes
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying
relief
on
his
42
denying reconsideration.
no reversible error.
stated
by
the
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint
and
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
district
court.
Barnes
v.
Thueme,
5:13-cv-02349-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25 & Dec. 2, 2013).
No.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?