Steven Barnes v. Carol Thueme

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-02349-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999308638]. Mailed to: Barnes. [14-6011]

Appeal: 14-6011

Doc: 10

Filed: 03/05/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6011

STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROL G.
OFFICE,

THUEME,

Court

Reporter;

COURT

ADMINISTRATION

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (5:13-cv-02349-RMG)

Submitted:

February 27, 2014

Decided:

March 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6011

Doc: 10

Filed: 03/05/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Steven

Louis

Barnes

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying

relief

on

his

42

denying reconsideration.
no reversible error.
stated

by

the

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2006)

complaint

and

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

district

court.

Barnes

v.

Thueme,

5:13-cv-02349-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25 & Dec. 2, 2013).

No.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2