Joseph A. Daniels v. Paul E. Caldwell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999302260-2], denying Motion for other relief [999298352-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999286744-3] Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00461-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999345965]. Mailed to: Daniels. [14-6015]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6015 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6015 JOSEPH A. DANIELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL E. CALDWELL, Richmond, Virginia, Medical Doctor, St. Mary’s Hospital, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00461-REP) Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph A. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6015 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). reversible appoint error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, counsel, for a jury we deny trial, Daniels’ and for motions a to physical examination, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:11-cv-00461-REP (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2013). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?