Alfred Martin, Jr. v. Broad River Correction Inst

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999338388-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-01510-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999341757]. Mailed to: Martin. [14-6121]

Appeal: 14-6121

Doc: 18

Filed: 04/23/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6121

ALFRED DONNIE MARTIN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BROAD RIVER CORR. INSTITUTION;
JONES; INMATE RICHARD M. KOUGH,

MAJOR

SHARON

SUTTON;

PVT

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(2:13-cv-01510-TMC)

Submitted:

April 17, 2014

Decided:

April 23, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Donnie Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Jocelyn Newman,
RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6121

Doc: 18

Filed: 04/23/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alfred

Donnie

Martin,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge

and

denying

relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

(2006)
We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Martin

v. Broad River Corr. Inst., No. 2:13-cv-01510-TMC (D.S.C. Nov.
19,

2013;

Jan.

17,

2014).

appointment of counsel.

We

deny

Martin’s

motion

for

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2