Kelvin Jerome Miles v. Gary Maynard

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999327648-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999302544-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-03211-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999371006]. Mailed to: Miles. [14-6132]

Appeal: 14-6132

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/06/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6132

KELVIN J. MILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional
Services; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; SHARON BAUCOM,
Medical Director; PAMELA KNABLE, MCIH Medical Director; DR.
DOLPH ALEX DRUCKMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03211-AW)

Submitted:

May 23, 2014

Decided:

June 6, 2014

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin J. Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton
Andrews,
Ryan
Alexander
Mitchell,
KRAMON
&
GRAHAM,
PA,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6132

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/06/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kelvin J. Miles appeals the district court’s orders
denying Miles’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal

and

denying

his

motion

for

reconsideration.

We

have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly,

we

dismiss

deny

leave

to

proceed

in

forma

pauperis

and

the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Miles v.

Maynard,

Aug.

2013).

No.

8:09-cv-03211-AW

(D.

Md.

May

9,

2013;

26,

We deny the motion to amend the complaint and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2