Randall Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prison

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00133-GMG-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999345854]. Mailed to: Randall Lee Conrad. [14-6134]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6134 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6134 RANDALL LEE CONRAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; DEPT. OF JUSTICE; R. A. PERDUE, Warden; MR. CREASY, Counselor; MS. WILSON, Secretary; MRS. THROPE, Officer, Defendants – Appellees, and NUMEROUS FCI GILMER EMPLOYEES, Counselors, Case Managers, etc., Officers, Secretaries, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00133-GMG-JES) Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Appeal: 14-6134 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-6134 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:12-cv-00133- GMG-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?